Abstract

Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) occupy sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats in 11 western states and 2 Canadian provinces. In September 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced the listing status for sage-grouse had changed from warranted but precluded to not warranted. The primary reason cited for this change of status was that the enactment of new regulatory mechanisms was sufficient to protect sage-grouse populations. One such plan is the 2008, Wyoming Sage Grouse Executive Order (SGEO), enacted by Governor Freudenthal. The SGEO identifies “Core Areas” that are to be protected by keeping them relatively free from further energy development and limiting other forms of anthropogenic disturbances near active sage-grouse leks. Using the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s sage-grouse lek count database and the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission database of oil and gas well locations, we investigated the effectiveness of Wyoming’s Core Areas, specifically: 1) how well Core Areas encompass the distribution of sage-grouse in Wyoming, 2) whether Core Area leks have a reduced probability of lek collapse, and 3) what, if any, edge effects intensification of oil and gas development adjacent to Core Areas may be having on Core Area populations.Core Areas contained 77% of male sage-grouse attending leks and 64% of active leks. Using Bayesian binomial probability analysis, we found an average 10.9% probability of lek collapse in Core Areas and an average 20.4% probability of lek collapse outside Core Areas. Using linear regression, we found development density outside Core Areas was related to the probability of lek collapse inside Core Areas. Specifically, probability of collapse among leks >4.83 km from inside Core Area boundaries was significantly related to well density within 1.61 km (1-mi) and 4.83 km (3-mi) outside of Core Area boundaries. Collectively, these data suggest that the Wyoming Core Area Strategy has benefited sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat conservation; however, additional guidelines limiting development densities adjacent to Core Areas may be necessary to effectively protect Core Area populations.

Highlights

  • Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter ‘sage-grouse’) are a landscape species of conservation concern across 11 U.S states and 2 Canadian provinces [1, 2, 3]

  • Using the Wyoming Game and Fish Department’s sage-grouse lek count database and the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission database of oil and gas well locations, we investigated the effectiveness of Wyoming’s Core Areas, : 1) how well Core Areas encompass the distribution of sage-grouse in Wyoming, 2) whether Core Area leks have a reduced probability of lek collapse, and 3) what, if any, edge effects intensification of oil and gas development adjacent to Core Areas may be having on Core Area populations

  • The probability of lek collapse was higher in non-Core Areas than in Core Areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter ‘sage-grouse’) are a landscape species of conservation concern across 11 U.S states and 2 Canadian provinces [1, 2, 3]. In 2010, during the seventh listing attempt, sage-grouse were deemed to be warranted but precluded [6]. This decision was based on several factors, including habitat loss, fragmentation and inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms [6]. Following this attempt, the 11 states within the current range of sage-grouse took steps to either fully implement previously established sage-grouse management plans or to develop and implement new plans [7]. The eighth, and most recent, ESA listing decision in 2015 resulted in a decision of not warranted, in part because of new regulatory mechanisms implemented to protect sage-grouse [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call