Abstract

The Campi Flegrei volcanic field (Italy) poses very high risk to the highly urbanized Neapolitan area. Eruptive history was dominated by explosive activity producing pyroclastic currents (hereon PCs; acronym for Pyroclastic Currents) ranging in scale from localized base surges to regional flows. Here we apply probabilistic numerical simulation approaches to produce PC hazard maps, based on a comprehensive spectrum of flow properties and vent locations. These maps are incorporated in a Geographic Information System (GIS) and provide all probable Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) scenarios from different source vents in the caldera, relevant for risk management planning. For each VEI scenario, we report the conditional probability for PCs (i.e., the probability for a given area to be affected by the passage of PCs in case of a PC-forming explosive event) and related dynamic pressure. Model results indicate that PCs from VEI<4 events would be confined within the Campi Flegrei caldera, PC propagation being impeded by the northern and eastern caldera walls. Conversely, PCs from VEI 4–5 events could invade a wide area beyond the northern caldera rim, as well as part of the Naples metropolitan area to the east. A major controlling factor of PC dispersal is represented by the location of the vent area. PCs from the potentially largest eruption scenarios (analogous to the ~15 ka, VEI 6 Neapolitan Yellow Tuff or even the ~39 ka, VEI 7 Campanian Ignimbrite extreme event) would affect a large part of the Campanian Plain to the north and the city of Naples to the east. Thus, in case of renewal of eruptive activity at Campi Flegrei, up to 3 million people will be potentially exposed to volcanic hazard, pointing out the urgency of an emergency plan. Considering the present level of uncertainty in forecasting the future eruption type, size and location (essentially based on statistical analysis of previous activity), we suggest that appropriate planning measures should face at least the VEI 5 reference scenario (at least 2 occurrences documented in the last 10 ka).

Highlights

  • Active calderas are among the most hazardous volcanic areas in the world [1]

  • In order to assess a comprehensive set of reference eruptive scenarios at Campi Flegrei caldera, we performed numerical simulations of PCs from explosive events ranging in Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) between 2 and 6, on a new 5 m resolution digital elevation model (DTM from INGV-Osservatorio Vesuviano), to produce probabilistic hazard maps embedded in a Geographic Information System (GIS) framework (Figs 2–6)

  • A comparison between the two sets of simulations show that no significant differences are observed for the higher intensity scenarios (VEI ! 4), neither with regard to the areas of invasion of PCs nor for the dynamic pressure values; for lower VEI scenarios, it is observed an extension of the invasion zone of the PCs beyond the topographical barrier represented by the caldera rim, when the eruptive sources are located in peripheral caldera settings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Active calderas are among the most hazardous volcanic areas in the world [1]. Caldera volcanism is characterized by rare, large-scale (VEI!5) explosive eruptions and even super-eruptions [2,3] and punctuated by more frequent intermediate- (VEI 3–4) or small-scale (VEI 1–2) events. In order to assess a comprehensive set of reference eruptive scenarios at Campi Flegrei caldera, we performed numerical simulations of PCs from explosive events ranging in VEI between 2 and 6, on a new 5 m resolution digital elevation model (DTM from INGV-Osservatorio Vesuviano), to produce probabilistic hazard maps embedded in a GIS framework (Figs 2–6). Textural and grain size features of phreatomagmatic PC deposits indicate an emplacement by dilute to moderately concentrated PCs (i.e., densities between a few kg/m3 and 102 kg/m3) The latter prevailed in the activity history and were related to several intracaldera tuff cones, as well as to a significant part of the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff major eruption [54,55]. Height (m) density (kg/m3) viscosity (Pa s) initial velocity m/s yield strength Pa dilute PDCs VEI2 5Ä10 2Ä30

Ä 2000
Results
Discussion and conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call