Abstract
Wheel profile is one of the most critical factors that governs the dynamic interaction between railcar wheels and the rail. This paper quantifies and analyzes 15,000 wheel profiles that were randomly selected from a dataset obtained from wayside wheel profile measurement systems from railcars that are in unrestricted interchange in the North American Class I railroad network. Mean dimensions for each of the four critical wheel tread parameters were as follows; 30.5 mm (1.202 in.) for flange height, 35.4 mm (1.395 in.) for flange thickness, 0.483 mm (0.019 in.) for hollow tread, and 37.8 mm (1.488 in.) for rim thickness. Further evaluation focused on the magnitude of hollow tread, one of the important factors that determines wheel rail contact location, contact patch size, and dynamic interaction of the railcar and track. Correlative analysis revealed that hollow tread is linearly related to flange height, flange thickness, and rim thickness. Given this relationship, we categorized wheel profile data into characteristic bins of wheel profiles, and a new classification system based on hollow tread was proposed that should be considered when designing track infrastructure components (e.g., turnout frogs). Combinations of parameters were derived and organized into five wheel-profile classification ranges, based on “most likely” to “least likely” profiles that might be encountered. For the five classifications (Type A to Type E), a range of hollow tread from 0 mm to 5 mm (interval of 1 mm) and corresponding mean values for the three other parameters were applied. This probabilistic analysis and classification of wheel profiles into categories enables better understanding of current North American wheel conditions. Additionally, these data and the proposed analysis method can be leveraged to further optimize wheel profiles and track components, identify relationships with rates of rail surface defects and track degradation, and prioritize maintenance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.