Abstract

The construction of conceptual geological models is an essential task in petroleum exploration, especially during the early stages of investment, when evidence about the subsurface is limited. In this task, geoscientists recreate the most likely geological scenarios that led to potential accumulation of reserves in a target block, based on past experience, historical analogues, and interpreted “signatures” that were left in the data by physical processes. Due to cognitive constraints, this task has traditionally focused on the single most likely conceptual scenario, or at most, a reduced set of scenarios chosen a priori via ad-hoc methods, which often lead to improper block valuation and severe money losses. In this work, we propose a probabilistic framework for reasoning about conceptual geological scenarios that helps domain experts maintain multiple hypotheses throughout the exploration program. The framework is extensible and can be instantiated automatically from simple knowledge templates, a form of “knowledge standard” in the company. We show how the acquired knowledge can be leveraged for uncertainty mitigation using concepts from information theory, and assess the framework qualitatively in a real case study.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.