Abstract

Short-term hourly load forecasting in South Africa using additive quantile regression (AQR) models is discussed in this study. The modelling approach allows for easy interpretability and accounting for residual autocorrelation in the joint modelling of hourly electricity data. A comparative analysis is done using generalised additive models (GAMs). In both modelling frameworks, variable selection is done using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) via hierarchical interactions. Four models considered are GAMs and AQR models with and without interactions, respectively. The AQR model with pairwise interactions was found to be the best fitting model. The forecasts from the four models were then combined using an algorithm based on the pinball loss (convex combination model) and also using quantile regression averaging (QRA). The AQR model with interactions was then compared with the convex combination and QRA models and the QRA model gave the most accurate forecasts. Except for the AQR model with interactions, the other two models (convex combination model and QRA model) gave prediction interval coverage probabilities that were valid for the 90 % , 95 % and the 99 % prediction intervals. The QRA model had the smallest prediction interval normalised average width and prediction interval normalised average deviation. The modelling framework discussed in this paper has established that going beyond summary performance statistics in forecasting has merit as it gives more insight into the developed forecasting models.

Highlights

  • In the literature, several modelling approaches are discussed in which hourly or half-hourly electricity demand data is modelled jointly and modelling of hourly data separately [1,2]

  • The four models M1 to M4 are combined based on the pinball losses, resulting in M5 and combined using quantile regression averaging (QRA), resulting in M6

  • The forecasts from the four models were combined using an algorithm based on the pinball loss and using quantile regression averaging (QRA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Several modelling approaches are discussed in which hourly or half-hourly electricity demand data is modelled jointly and modelling of hourly data separately [1,2]. The authors further argue that over-fitting and the burden of model checking are significantly reduced if one model is fitted to the data. This modelling approach leads to the problem of the dimensional curse. Proponents of this modelling approach argue that the use of factor analysis can help in identifying a few factors that can account for most of the Energies 2018, 11, 2208; doi:10.3390/en11092208 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call