Abstract

We present an approach to assess the risk taken by on-road vehicles within the framework of artificial field theory, envisioned for safety analysis and design of driving support/automation applications. Here, any obstacle (neighboring entity on the road) to the subject vehicle is treated as a finite scalar risk field that is formulated in the predicted configuration space of the subject vehicle. The driving risk estimate is the strength of the risk field at the subject vehicle’s future location. This risk field is formulated as the product of two factors: collision probability and expected crash energy. The collision probability with neighboring vehicles is estimated based on probabilistic motion predictions. The risk can be assessed for a single time step or over multiple future time steps, depending on the required temporal resolution of the estimates. We verified the single step approach in three near-crash situations from a naturalistic dataset and in cut-in and hard-braking scenarios with simulation and showed the application of the multi-step approach in selecting the safest path in a lane-drop section. The risk descriptions from the proposed approach qualitatively reflect the narration of the situation and are in general consistent with Time To Collision. Compared to current surrogate measures of safety, the proposed risk estimate provides a better basis to assess the driving safety of an individual vehicle by considering the uncertainty over the future ambient traffic state and magnitude of expected crash consequences. The proposed driving risk model can be used as a component of intelligent vehicle safety applications and as a comprehensive surrogate measure for assessing traffic safety.

Highlights

  • Traffic safety has attracted increasing research attention, in particular in the transition from human-driven vehicles to automated vehicles

  • Summary of simulation results Compared to Time To Collision (TTC), it can be seen that the number of false risk values is lower and true risk values are higher in Probabilistic Driving Risk Field (PDRF) risk estimate

  • We presented an approach to assess driving risk, which employs a probabilistic motion prediction scheme within the framework of artificial potential field theory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traffic safety has attracted increasing research attention, in particular in the transition from human-driven vehicles to automated vehicles. Modelling dynamic driving risk entails a detailed description of the subject vehicle and its environment. Safety analysts have the means to scrutinise driving at a far more detailed level, thanks to the high resolution driving data provided by modern sensing and communication technologies. In this context, we explore the possibility of developing an assessment method for driving safety (converse risk). We explore the possibility of developing an assessment method for driving safety (converse risk) Such a method can be used to assess the risk of human driving, and to evaluate (and design) proactive safety systems and advanced vehicle control systems.

Relevant work in literature
Objective and contribution
Modelling driving risk in the single-step approach
Road boundary object as a risk field
Modelling the neighboring vehicle as a risk field
Estimating risk over multiple time steps
Example model applications
Risk assessment of near-crash events
Rear crash avoided by swerving
Simulation based validation
Multi-step risk estimation of path plans
Discussion
Findings
Conclusion
2: Result
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call