Abstract

A nonconstructive proof can be used to prove the existence of an object with some properties without providing an explicit example of such an object. A special case is a probabilistic proof where we show that an object with required properties appears with some positive probability in some random process. Can we use such arguments to prove the existence of a computable infinite object? Sometimes yes: following [8], we show how the notion of a layerwise computable mapping can be used to prove a computable version of Lovasz local lemma.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call