Abstract

Among measures that are used to prevent the triggering of shallow landslides and for erosion control, root reinforcement has spread out widely as its contribution to environmental sustainability is high. Although in recent years reliability-based design (RBD) has been applied increasingly to the assessment of slope stability to address the shortcomings of the deterministic approach (which does not consider geotechnical uncertainties explicitly), there is still a lack in the application of this method to root reinforcement. Plants are characterised by high inherent uncertainty, making it necessary to investigate the level of reliability of these soil-bioengineering techniques. In this context, to determine whether or not root-reinforced slopes designed according to Eurocodes (that is, by applying their statistical partial factors), and providing satisfactory factors of safety, may lead to a probability of failure that is, in contrast, unacceptable, the Authors carried out several probabilistic analyses by using Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). MCS was applied to the simplified Bishop Method modified to bear pseudo-static forces representing earthquake loading in mind. To take into account the mechanical effect provided by roots, an apparent root cohesion was added to the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. Results showed that not every slope configuration that satisfies the safety criterion has acceptable levels of reliability, and this evidence is caused by the high variability of the design parameters.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call