Abstract

Recently, Wang and Theeuwes used the additional singleton task and showed that attentional capture was reduced for the location that was likely to contain a distractor [1]. It is argued that due to statistical learning, the location that was likely to contain a distractor was suppressed relative to all other locations. The current study replicated these findings and by adding a search-probe condition, we were able to determine the initial distribution of attentional resources across the visual field. Consistent with a space-based resource allocation ("biased competition") model, it was shown that the representation of a probe presented at the location that was likely to contain a distractor was suppressed relative to other locations. Critically, the suppression of this location resulted in more attention being allocated to the target location relative to a condition in which the distractor was not suppressed. This suggests that less capture by the distractor results in more attention being allocated to the target. The results are consistent with the view that the location that is likely to contain a distractor is suppressed before display onset, modulating the first feed-forward sweep of information input into the spatial priority map.

Highlights

  • It is important to be able to attend to events that are relevant to us and ignore information that may distract us

  • Subsequent planned comparisons showed that, against the no-distractor condition, there were significant attentional capture effects when the distractor singleton was presented at the high-probability location, t (15) = 11.25, p < .001, cohen’s d = 0.43, and when it was presented at the low-probability location, t (15) = 14.01, p < .001, cohen’s d = 1.14

  • The results showed that, when the probe was presented at the target location, there was no difference between the no-distractor condition and the condition that the distractor was presented at the high-probability location, t (15) = 0.51, p = .618, cohen's d = 0.07, BF01 = 3.5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is important to be able to attend to events that are relevant to us and ignore information that may distract us. The extent to which we are able to avoid such distraction from salient events has been a central question for decades. It was argued that the repeated exposure to stimuli creates (often implicitly) learned selection biases, shaped by the repeated associations of value, emotion valence, or other statistical regularities [3, 6, 7].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call