Abstract

Irrelevant salient objects may capture our attention and interfere with visual search. Recently, it was shown that distraction by a salient object is reduced when it is presented more frequently at one location than at other locations. The present study investigates whether this reduced distractor interference is the result of proactive spatial suppression, implemented prior to display onset, or reactive suppression, occurring after attention has been directed to that location. Participants were asked to search for a shape singleton in the presence of an irrelevant salient color singleton which was presented more often at one location (the high-probability location) than at all other locations (the low-probability locations). On some trials, instead of the search task, participants performed a probe task, in which they had to detect the offset of a probe dot. The results of the search task replicated previous findings showing reduced distractor interference in trials in which the salient distractor was presented at the high-probability location as compared with the low-probability locations. The probe task showed that reaction times were longer for probes presented at the high-probability location than at the low-probability locations. These results indicate that through statistical learning the location that is likely to contain a distractor is suppressed proactively (i.e., prior to display onset). It suggests that statistical learning modulates the first feed-forward sweep of information processing by deprioritizing locations that are likely to contain a distractor in the spatial priority map.

Highlights

  • Irrelevant salient objects may capture our attention and interfere with visual search

  • The results show higher accuracy (β = .27, SE = 0.07, z = 4.01, p < .001) and shorter reaction times (RTs) (β = −42.74, SE = 4.41, t(60) = −9.70, p < .001), when the distractor was presented at the high-probability location as compared with the low-probability location indicating that attentional capture by the salient distractor was reduced when it was presented at the high probability location

  • As indicated by two clusters (100th ~ 250th trial, 340th ~ 480th trial) in Fig. 3, participants were faster to find the target when the distractor was presented at the high-probability location than at the low-probability location (p < .001), suggesting that participants learned to suppress the highprobability location from around the 100th trial on

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Irrelevant salient objects may capture our attention and interfere with visual search. The results of the search task replicated previous findings showing reduced distractor interference in trials in which the salient distractor was presented at the highprobability location as compared with the low-probability locations. The probe task showed that reaction times were longer for probes presented at the high-probability location than at the low-probability locations These results indicate that through statistical learning the location that is likely to contain a distractor is suppressed proactively (i.e., prior to display onset). It has been shown that observers learn statistical regularities regarding probable distractor locations which in turn leads to a Based on these results, it was argued that after several trials, the high-probability location becomes suppressed through a process of statistical learning, which facilitates target selection. It is feasible that following attentional capture, observers have learned to disengage faster from the location that is likely to contain a distractor than from the other locations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call