Abstract

Background: Seismic risk mitigation is an important issue in earthquake-prone countries, and needs to be solved in those complex communities governed by complex processes, where urban planning, socioeconomic dynamics, and, often, the need to preserve cultural assets are present simultaneously. In recent years, due to limited financial resources, mitigation activities have often been limited to post-earthquake events, and only a few in periods of inactivity, particularly in urban planning. At this point, a significant change in point of view is necessary. Methods: The seismic risk mitigation (and more generally, natural risk mitigation) must be considered as the main topic in urban planning and in the governance of communities. In fact, in several recent earthquakes, significant socioeconomic losses have been caused by the low or lack of resilience of the communities. This is mainly due to the high vulnerability of private buildings, in particular, housing units. Results: Therefore, in recent years, several studies have been conducted on the seismic resilience of communities. However, significant improvements are still needed for the resilience assessment of the housing stock, both qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, which is applied to the housing system, a proposal regarding a change in urban planning and emergency management tools based on the concept of resilience is reported. As a first application, a case study in Italy is considered. Conclusion: The proposal is focused on defining and quantifying the improvement of the resilience of the communities and this must be obtained by modifying the current Civil Protection plan. New tools are based on a new resilience community plan by encompassing urban planning tools, resilient mitigation strategies, and consequently, emergency management planning.

Highlights

  • It has been ascertained that earthquake prediction for civil activities is not possible, and in any case, it would be of little use for the mitigation objectives in short to medium term

  • An example of an inpractice application is the current implementation of these concepts in the state of California, in particular in the cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco, where resilience has been considered in the mitigation strategies based on existing studies from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) [20]

  • This study focuses on the residential building stock but with a clear awareness that it is a component of the overall measure of community resilience

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has been ascertained that earthquake prediction for civil activities is not possible, and in any case, it would be of little use for the mitigation objectives in short to medium term. From an engineering point of view, the best way to improve community performance is to improve mitigation and prevention strategies To this end, the decision makers, population, and tools play key roles. Resilience has increasingly become the key to defining risk reduction and management strategies [1 - 3] This is because an approach focused on the concept of resilience can significantly highlight the critical issues and endogenous resources of a community. Due to limited financial resources, mitigation activities have often been limited to post-earthquake events, and only a few in periods of inactivity, in urban planning. At this point, a significant change in point of view is necessary

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call