Abstract

BackgroundMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) causes substantial symptomatic burden in advanced malignancy. Although pleural fluid cytology is a commonly accepted gold standard of diagnosis, its low diagnostic yield is a challenge for clinicians. The aim of this study was to determine whether pro-cathepsin D can serve as a novel biomarker to discriminate between MPE and benign pleural effusion (BPE).MethodsThis study included 81 consecutive patients with exudative pleural effusions who had underwent thoracentesis or pleural biopsy. Pleural fluid and serum were collected as a standard procedure for all individuals at the same time. The level of pro-cathepsin D was measured by the sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.ResultsThough there were no significant differences in plasma pro-cathepsin D between the two groups, the level of pleural fluid pro-cathepsin D was significantly higher in the MPE group than the BPE group (0.651 versus 0.590 pg/mL, P = 0.034). The discriminative power of pleural fluid pro-cathepsin D for diagnosing MPE was moderate, with 81% sensitivity and 53% specificity at a pro-cathepsin D cut-off ≥0.596 pg/mL (area under the curve: 0.656). Positive and negative predictive values for MPE were 38 and 89%, respectively, with pro-cathepsin D cut-off value (> 0.596 pg/mL).ConclusionsThe level of pleural fluid pro-cathepsin D was found to be significantly higher in MPE than in BPE. Although results of this study could not support the sole use of pleural fluid pro-cathepsin D to diagnose MPE, pleural fluid pro-cathepsin D can be added to pre-existing diagnostic methods for ruling-in or ruling-out MPE.

Highlights

  • Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) causes substantial symptomatic burden in advanced malignancy

  • We aimed to investigate the value of pro-Cathepsin D in differentiating MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE)

  • Characteristics of study participants In total, 81 cases with pleural effusion were enrolled in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) causes substantial symptomatic burden in advanced malignancy. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication of lung cancer and intrathoracic spreading or metastasis of extra-thoracic malignancy [1,2,3]. It is encountered as advanced malignancy at the time of diagnosis, progression of primary disease despite antineoplastic treatment, or recurrence. The definite diagnosis of MPE is determined by pleural fluid cytology, once or several times, or sometimes by pleural biopsy [1]. Pleural fluid cytology is a simple method for diagnosis, its diagnostic yield is approximately 60% and depends on the underlying pathologic type of primary malignancy [1, 4]. There is an increasing need to discover noninvasive biomarkers to diagnose or rule-out MPE accurately and efficiently in clinical practice [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call