Abstract

Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) is reputed the most successful trace to identify the source of a digital video. However, its effectiveness is mainly limited by compression and the effect of recently introduced electronic image stabilization on several devices. In the last decade, several approaches were proposed to overcome both these issues, mainly by selecting those video frames which are considered more informative. However, the two problems were always treated separately, and the combined effect of compression and digital stabilization was never considered. This separated analysis makes it hard to understand if achieved conclusions still stand for digitally stabilized videos and if those choices represent a general optimum strategy to perform video source attribution. In this paper, we explore whether an optimum strategy exists in selecting frames based on their type and their positions within the groups of pictures. We, therefore, systematically analyze the PRNU contribute provided by all frames belonging to either digitally stabilized or not stabilized videos. Results on the VISION dataset come up with some insights into optimizing video source attribution in different use cases.

Highlights

  • Video source attribution is commonly addressed by extracting the traces left into the content by the Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU), originated by manufacturing processes in the form of slight imperfections in light response of pixels, and by comparing them to a reference trace characterizing the device

  • We show the Equal Error Rate (EER) computed for the Detection Error Trade-off (DET) curves obtained by considering the frames in position {1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 29th}, for each group of pictures (GOP)

  • We evaluated which type of frame is more useful to perform PRNUbased video source attribution, even in presence of electronic image stabilization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Video source attribution is commonly addressed by extracting the traces left into the content by the Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU), originated by manufacturing processes in the form of slight imperfections in light response of pixels, and by comparing them to a reference trace characterizing the device. This methodology, firstly applied for image source attribution [1,2], provided outstanding results in several contexts, even when the source or questioned device is not available [3,4], as well as in large-scale scenarios [5], or when an image is exchanged through social media platforms [6,7]. The main reason behind this is that most frames, being strongly compressed, slightly contribute to the estimate of the noise pattern

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call