Abstract

IntroductionDetermining the etiology of Cushing’s syndrome is very challenging to endocrinologists, with most of the difficulty arising from subtype differentiation of adrenocorticotropic hormone–dependent Cushing’s syndrome. We present the pitfalls of evaluating a rare cause of adrenocorticotropic hormone–independent Cushing’s syndrome in the transition period between adolescence and adulthood.Case presentationA sibling pair with familial isolated primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease is described. The index case, a 20-year-old Chinese woman, presented with premenopausal osteoporosis with T12 compression fracture and young hypertension. Biochemical analysis confirmed adrenocorticotropic hormone–independent Cushing’s syndrome (elevated 0800 h plasma cortisol 808 nmol/L with suppressed adrenocorticotropic hormone level <5 pg/ml). Computed tomography of her adrenal glands revealed a 0.7-cm left adrenal hypodense nodule. After a left adrenalectomy, she had residual hypercortisolism (progressive weight gain, new T10 compression fracture, and not glucocorticoid-dependent postoperatively). Completion of contralateral adrenalectomy was performed upon recognition of typical histologic characteristics of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease found in an initial left adrenalectomy specimen. Similarly, her younger brother developed adrenocorticotropic hormone–independent Cushing’s syndrome at age 18 years, with typical cushingoid habitus, but no osteoporosis or hypertension. His adrenal computed tomographic scans showed micronodularities over bilateral adrenal glands. He was successfully treated with bilateral adrenalectomy. Screening for Carney’s complex and PRKAR1A gene mutation was negative. Signs and symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome resolved after bilateral adrenalectomy for both patients. They were placed on lifelong glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid replacement therapy and long-term surveillance for Carney’s complex.ConclusionsThe cases of these two patients illustrate the difficulties involved in diagnosing primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease, a variant of adrenocorticotropic hormone–independent Cushing’s syndrome that is managed with bilateral adrenalectomy. A high index of suspicion for this disease is needed, especially in adolescents with adrenocorticotropic hormone–independent Cushing’s syndrome who have a significant family history, features of Carney’s complex, and no resolution of Cushing’s syndrome after unilateral adrenalectomy. Patients with primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease can either have bilateral/multiple adrenal nodules or normal adrenal glands visualized by computed tomography. Long-term surveillance is imperative in patients with confirmed Carney’s complex and in those who have not undergone complete genetic testing to exclude this hereditary disorder.

Highlights

  • Determining the etiology of Cushing’s syndrome is very challenging to endocrinologists, with most of the difficulty arising from subtype differentiation of adrenocorticotropic hormone–dependent Cushing’s syndrome

  • Patients with primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease can either have bilateral/multiple adrenal nodules or normal adrenal glands visualized by computed tomography

  • 10–15 % of ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is caused by bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH) [2], which comprises Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD) and ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (AIMAH)

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

The two reported cases illustrate the difficulties involved in diagnosing PPNAD, a variant of ACTH-independent CS that more commonly presents with osteoporosis in young patients and is ideally managed by bilateral adrenalectomy. A high index of suspicion is needed, especially in adolescents with ACTH-independent CS, a family history of CS, multiple and/or bilateral adrenal nodules, features of CNC, and failure of resolution of CS after unilateral adrenalectomy. The diagnosis of PPNAD in patients without a family history or an index case in a yet-to-be-identified kindred is harder. Authors’ contributions LLL carried out history-taking, performed relevant examination and investigation of the patients, and was involved in writing the manuscript. SSP, JR, and LI participated in the literature review and were involved in writing the manuscript. SPC, ATBT, and SRV participated in the supervision of case management and the writing of the manuscript, including final proofreading.

Introduction
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call