Abstract
Two common privilege claims in limiting grand juries' evidence requests are attorney-client and self-incrimination. This article examines In re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mr. S.), 662 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2011) to illustrate the issue of both privileges in a case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
