Abstract
The public police's performance of policing services paid for by private individuals has not been the subject of significant empirical research. Case‐law and legislation in the United Kingdom permit the police to charge for services that fall outside the police's duty to protect the public; however, the scope of the police's duty is, in practice, determined by the police themselves, and need not extend to all services that are deemed necessary for public safety. Recent cases on the police's duty suggest that such ‘special police services’, often of the preventative kind that is commonly associated with private policing, are those that, if provided free of charge, would place a predictable yet unusual strain on local police budgets. A combination of coercions and incentives explain why some members of the public to pay for public, as opposed to private, policing services in these circumstances. While the spectre of a gradual privatisation of the public police through this process is a plausible one, it is equally arguable that privately paid public policing is a means of preserving the present level and mode of public policing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.