Abstract
In the early days of the dispute resolution movement—the ‘80s and ‘90s—the concern was often expressed that we were developing a system of “second‐class justice” for those who couldn't afford the courts. The wealthy, of course, would continue to have access to the “first‐class justice” that the public courts provided.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have