Abstract
To report on the private health insurance (PHI) status of individuals with and without a mental health problem, and examine whether PHI status is associated with access to psychological services. This is a descriptive study of nationally representative population-based data collected in 2009 (HILDA) with participants aged 15-93 (n = 13,301). Key measures included: PHI status (categorised as 'hospital cover only', 'extras cover only', or 'both hospital and extras cover'); mental health status (categorised as 'have a mental health problem' or 'do not have a mental health problem' using the mental health index (MHI) of the medical outcomes study short form); mental health service use (access to a mental health professional (psychologist/psychiatrist) in the past 12 months categorised as 'yes' or 'no'). Individuals with a mental health problem were less likely to have PHI than those without a mental health problem. However, PHI was not associated with access to a mental health professional in the past 12 months. The findings suggest that while the discrepancy in PHI status is a marker of inequity between those with and without a mental health problem, it is not a key factor in facilitating access to mental health services.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
