Abstract

Few problems of medieval credit have received more attention from continental historians than that of financial instruments. The medieval tratta (bill of exchange), its origin and diffusion, has been a special favourite with the student, and we now know more about its legal and diplomatic evolution in the middle ages than we do of its fortunes in modern times. But this added knowledge has had surprisingly little influence upon the relevant principles of economic history. In spite of the accumulating in formation the writers of economic history are still apt to repre sent the technique of medieval credit, especially in the trans actions of the non-Italian merchants, not only as something far less elaborate and perfect than the modern technique (which would probably be true), but as its complete antipode: the embodiment of an entirely different economic principle, part of a different, 'medieval', order of things. To the present day the teaching of economic history in England conforms to the tra ditional notion which Cunningham has epitomised in his bino mial formula: dealing for credit was little developed and dea ling in credit was unknown. By 'dealing in credit' Cunning ham obviously meant the selling and the buying of credit: its transfer and circulation. Though bills were used for trans mission of wealth, there is a striking difference between those

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.