Abstract
Abstract The purpose of the “debt brake” laid down in the German constitution is to limit public debt. However, public law mechanisms are unsuited in practice to prevent excessive government deficits. This article argues that, contrary to the prevailing opinion, the effects of the debt brake are not limited to public law. Rather, infringements of the debt brake may result in civil law consequences. It is argued that state loans or bonds violating the debt brake may be null and void and the parties in this case must make restitution under unjust enrichment law. Therefore, (potential) creditors have an interest to monitor government borrowing. A form of "private enforcement" of the debt brake is, therefore, possible.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
