Abstract

Private enforcement of European competition law is still in a state of underdevelopment. The European Commission is considering steps to facilitate claims for private damages in cases of breach of Articles 81 and 82 EC Treaty. The lack of hierarchy between the different goals of private enforcement, in particular deterrence and compensation, makes legal reforms in this area difficult. Mechanisms increasing the deterrent effect of private damages claims, such as the award of multiple damages or allowing opt-out collective actions, may conflict with legal principles prohibiting over-compensation in individual cases or guaranteeing basic rights of defence. Facilitating private enforcement also entails the risk of unmeritorious suits and may cause counter-productive interference with public enforcement schemes, such as leniency programmes. Finally, to create a ‘level playing field’ for industry in Europe, harmonisation measures are needed. One should be cautious that the ensuing harmonisation costs do not exceed the expected benefits of private damages claims for infringements of European competition law.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.