Abstract
ABSTRACTThis comment piece analyses the Supreme Court decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd. The case is an important source of principle on the availability of injunctive relief where the private information at stake becomes widely known. Despite this, the decision is a missed opportunity to clarify some of the key controversies within the misuse of private information jurisprudence. Specifically, the Court might have done more to clarify the nature and meaning of the enigmatic ‘freedom to criticise’ doctrine. The decision also adopts a controversial approach concerning the adequacy of damages where wealthy claimants are involved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
