Abstract
Background:Bispectral index (BIS) and response entropy (RE) are used to monitor the depth of anesthesia.Objectives:To collect published data and compare the accuracy of BIS and RE in detecting the transition of consciousness during sevoflurane anesthesia.Data sources:Studies indexed in the PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane databases.Study eligibility criteria:1.Monitoring of sevoflurane anesthesia depth with BIS and RE simultaneously;2.Use of prediction probability values to evaluate prediction accuracy; and3.The full text of the published study is available and contains sufficient data for further analyses.Participants:Patients who need to use BIS and RE to monitor sevoflurane anesthesia depth simultaneously.Interventions:A random-effects model was fitted using RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analyses were performed on patient age. The Cochrane I2 methodology was used to determine the heterogeneity of the statistical results, while GRADE Pro served to assess the quality of evidence.Results:Overall, 195 articles were identified, of which 7 were finally included. The meta-analysis results showed that BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting loss of consciousness (LOC) during sevoflurane anesthesia (MD, .06; 95% confidence interval [CI], .02–.09; P = .009; I2 = 92%). In contrast, there was no significant difference between BIS and RE for recovery of consciousness (ROC; MD, .01; 95% CI, .00–.02; P = .79; I2 = 83%). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in LOC (MD, .02; 95% CI, .01–.05; P = .13; I2 = 60%) and ROC (MD, −.01; 95% CI, −.06–.04; P = .58; I2 = 95%) in children. However, the results in adults demonstrated that BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting LOC (MD, −.07; 95% CI, .05–.10; P = .002; I2 = 76%).Limitations:First, this meta-analysis was affected by a large study heterogeneity. Second, this analysis only included publications in English, therefore, some studies may have been omitted.Conclusion:BIS is more accurate than RE in predicting LOC during sevoflurane anesthesia in adults. However, no significant differences were identified in children.Registration number (PROSPERO):CRD42020163119
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.