Prioritizing Post-Disaster Reconstruction Projects Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach: A Case Study

Zahra Mohammadnazari,Mohammad Alipour-Vaezi,Mobina Mousapour Mamoudan,Amir Aghsami,Fariborz Jolai,Maziar Yazdani

doi:10.3390/buildings12020136

Zahra Mohammadnazari, Mohammad Alipour-Vaezi + Show 4 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020136

Copy DOI

Abstract

As the destructive impacts of both human-made and natural disasters on societies and built environments are predicted to increase in the future, innovative disaster management strategies to cope with emergency conditions are becoming more crucial. After a disaster, selecting the most critical post-disaster reconstruction projects among available projects is a challenging decision due to resource constraints. There is strong evidence that the success of many post-disaster reconstruction projects is compromised by inappropriate decisions when choosing the most critical projects. Therefore, this study presents an integrated approach based on four multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, namely, TOPSIS, ELECTRE III, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE, to aid decision makers in prioritizing post-disaster projects. Furthermore, an aggregation approach (linear assignment) is used to generate the final ranking vector since various methods may provide different outcomes. In the first stage, 21 criteria were determined based on sustainability. To validate the performance of the proposed approach, the obtained results were compared to the results of an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm, which was applied to predict the projects’ success rates. A case study was used to assess the application of the proposed model. The obtained results show that in the selected case, the most critical criteria in post-disaster project selection are quality, robustness, and customer satisfaction. The findings of this study can contribute to the growing body of knowledge about disaster management strategies and have implications for key stakeholders involved in post-disaster reconstruction projects. Furthermore, this study provides valuable information for national decision makers in countries that have limited experience with disasters and where the destructive consequences of disasters on the built environment are increasing.

Highlights

Over the last several decades, there has been a remarkable increase in the frequency, magnitude, and severity of human-made and natural disasters such as terrorist attacks, earthquakes, hurricanes, and large floods, which have had severe immediate and longterm consequences on the economy, society, and built environment [1]
With the help of some multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques, we aimed to rank the possible alternatives in Khakpey Company (KP)
The final results of artificial neural network (ANN) show the similarity of the VIKOR-based linear assignment method and ANN

Summary

Introduction

Over the last several decades, there has been a remarkable increase in the frequency, magnitude, and severity of human-made and natural disasters such as terrorist attacks, earthquakes, hurricanes, and large floods, which have had severe immediate and longterm consequences on the economy, society, and built environment [1]. Such events have challenged critical infrastructures in many countries [2]. The extent and severity of damage to city infrastructure during extreme floods in Golestan, Iran, in 2019 had a negative impact on healthcare services [4]. Various organizations are increasing the pressure on disaster management research to develop effective strategies for making cities resilient

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion