Abstract

Adourian et al. in a case report identify a patient with a previous vasectomy antiprotamine IgG antibodies and 2 hypotensive episodes after receiving protamine. In presenting the case the authors imply that the patient suffered 2 anaphylactic reactions to protamine that IgG antibodies to protamine were a response to prior vasectomy. This author however argues that the case report does not support these implications and that any association among these observations remains speculative. He takes issue with the authors contentions that both reactions to protamine were anaphylactic and that IgG antibodies to protamine produce severe reactions to protamine. Furthermore although the patient could have produced antiprotamine antibodies during his vasectomy and from his exposure to intravenous protamine during catheterization the authors do not state why the vasectomy is to blame. Current evidence including the Adourian case is simply inadequate to implicate prior vasectomy as a risk factor for severe reactions to protamine.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.