Abstract

ABSTRACTBayesian item response theory (IRT) modeling stages include (a) specifying the IRT likelihood model, (b) specifying the parameter prior distributions, (c) obtaining the posterior distribution, and (d) making appropriate inferences. The latter stage, and the focus of this research, includes model criticism. Choice of priors with the posterior predictive checks (PPC) model-checking method requires more attention. The objective of this research is to investigate the extent of the effect of prior specification on the conclusions drawn from the PPC method. Findings indicated that the choice of discrepancy measure is an important factor in the overall success of the method, and that different discrepancy measures are affected more than others by prior specification. The use of percent correct as a discrepancy statistic was ineffective regardless of prior specification or type of misfit. Recommendations and suggestions for future research are provided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.