Abstract

This paper presents an improvement in the Huber–Mises–Hencky (HMH) material effort hypothesis proposed by Burzyński. Unlike the HMH hypothesis, it differentiates the plastic effort between compression and tensile load states, and links shear with tensile limit. Furthermore, it considers the fact that construction materials do not have infinite resistance in the pure tensile hydrostatic load state, which was proved by the static load experiment performed on St12T heat-resistant steel. The asymmetry between tensile and compressive loads is captured by the elastic region asymmetry coefficient , which was established by experiment for St12T steel in the temperature range between 20 °C and 800 °C.

Highlights

  • Demonstrating thermal stresses and strains is generally a complex and challenging task

  • In the case of steep and fluctuated loads containing rapid cooling–heating cycles, the thermal stresses can become much higher than yield strength inducing plastic deformation

  • Numerical simulations include an asymmetry parameter derived from the experiment run in several thermal conditions, which is a novel approach in such models [16,17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Demonstrating thermal stresses and strains is generally a complex and challenging task. The following paper proposes a novel model of the phenomena, with an emphasis on viewing strength variability as a function of material load (effort) This approach was used to model the stress and deformation in turbine components, and is successfully tailored to describe the physical phenomena present in the wet combustion liner designed in the project. Numerical simulations include an asymmetry parameter derived from the experiment run in several thermal conditions, which is a novel approach in such models [16,17] This unique method is barely present in the literature and includes an additional Burzynski component based on the energy of volumetric deformation. As a result of that, ceramic materials have many potential applications in aerospace engineering, e.g., turbine blades or combustion chambers [20,21]

The Material Effort Description by the Energy Approach
The Huber Material Effort
An Extended Burzynski Material Effort
Huber–Mises–Hencky and Burzynski Equivalent Stress
Experimental Procedure
Limit Properties of the St12T Steel
Thermal Shifts of Burzynski Plastic Regions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.