Abstract
The subject. The system of principles of legal proceedings is one of the indicators of the independence of the type of legal proceedings. The article analyzes the general and distinctive features of the principles enshrined in the Russian Civil Procedure Сode and the Code of Administrative Procedure. The purpose of the article is confirmation or confutation of the hypothesis that there is no independent system of principles of administrative proceedings that differs from the system of principles of civil proceedings. The methodology of the study includes the formal legal method, analysis, synthesis. The main results. All of the principles enshrined in the Code of Administrative Procedure are also enshrined in the Civil Procedure Code except some minor characteristics. So, the active role of the court, involving a number of exceptions to the usual rules of evidence, was also characteristic of the regulation of the consideration of cases arising from public legal relations in the Code of Civil Procedure. The court’s active actions to determine the subject of evidence, to recover evidence are general rules of evidence for all types of proceedings. These rules existed both before the adoption of the Code of Administrative Procedure and after it. But the specifics of the execution of judicial acts adopted in cases of administrative proceedings require special attention. A characteristic feature in the consideration and resolution of most administrative cases is the immediate execution of decisions enshrined directly in the Code of Administrative Procedure. Such a rule can be considered as a priority of immediate execution, which is a characteristic feature of administrative proceedings. The author doubts about the need for normative consolidation of the principles, as well as the need for a special list of principles of administrative legal proceedings in separate article of the procedural code. Conclusons. The absence of an independent system of administrative procedural principles confirms the thesis that administrative proceedings cannot be considered an independent branch of law separated from civil proceedings law. However, the priority of immediate execution of a court decision is a characteristic feature (perhaps even a principle) of administrative proceedings.
Highlights
Анализируются общие и отличительные черты принципов, закрепленных Гражданским процессуальным кодексом и Кодексом административного судопроизводства, составляющих систему принципов судопроизводства – один из показателей самостоятельности вида судопроизводства
The article analyzes the general and distinctive features of the principles enshrined in the Russian Civil Procedure Сode and the Code of Administrative Procedure
The purpose of the article is confirmation or confutation of the hypothesis that there is no independent system of principles of administrative proceedings that differs from the system of principles of civil proceedings
Summary
Анализируются общие и отличительные черты принципов, закрепленных Гражданским процессуальным кодексом и Кодексом административного судопроизводства, составляющих систему принципов судопроизводства – один из показателей самостоятельности вида судопроизводства. 2. Наличие статьи-перечня принципов административного судопроизводства как отличительная черта КАС КАС посвящает отдельную статью (ст.6 КАС) перечню принципов административного судопроизводства, всего их семь: независимость судей; равенство всех перед законом и судом; законность и справедливость при рассмотрении дел; осуществление судопроизводства в разумный срок и исполнение судебных актов в разумный срок; гласность и открытость судебного разбирательства; непосредственность судебного разбирательства; состязательность и равноправие сторон при активной роли суда
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.