Abstract
Controlling the structure of graphene oxide (GO) phases and their smaller analogues, graphene (oxide) quantum dots (GOQDs), is vitally important for any of their widespread intended applications: highly ordered arrangements of nanoparticles for thin-film or membrane applications of GO, dispersed nanoparticles for composite materials and three-dimensional porous arrangements for hydrogels. In aqueous environments, it is not only the chemical composition of the GO flakes that determines their morphologies; external factors such as pH and the coexisting cations also influence the structures formed. By using accurate models of GO that capture the heterogeneity of surface oxidation and very large-scale coarse-grained molecular dynamics that can simulate the behaviour of GO at realistic sizes of GOQDs, the driving forces that lead to the various morphologies in aqueous solution are resolved. We find the morphologies are determined by a complex interplay between electrostatic, {pi }–{pi } and hydrogen bonding interactions. Assembled morphologies can be controlled by changing the degree of oxidation and the pH. In acidic aqueous solution, the GO flakes vary from fully aggregated over graphitic domains to partial aggregation via hydrogen bonding between hydroxylated domains, leading to the formation of planar extended flakes at high oxidation ratios and stacks at low oxidation ratios. At high pH, where the edge carboxylic acid groups are deprotonated, electrostatic repulsion leads to more dispersion, but a variety of aggregation behaviour is surprisingly still observed: over graphitic regions, via hydrogen bonding and “face-edge” interactions. Calcium ions cause additional aggregation, with a greater number of “face-face” and “edge-edge” aggregation mechanisms, leading to irregular aggregated structures. “Face-face” aggregation mechanisms are enhanced by the GO flakes possessing distinct domains of hydroxylated and graphitic regions, with {pi }–{pi } and hydrogen bonding interactions prevalent between these regions on aggregated flakes respectively. These findings furnish explanations for the aggregation characteristics of GO and GOQDs, and provide computational methods to design directed synthesis routes for self-assembled and associated applications.
Highlights
Controlling the structure of graphene oxide (GO) phases and their smaller analogues, graphene quantum dots (GOQDs), is vitally important for any of their widespread intended applications: highly ordered arrangements of nanoparticles for thin-film or membrane applications of GO, dispersed nanoparticles for composite materials and three-dimensional porous arrangements for hydrogels
In this paper we explore the aggregation modes of GO and Graphene-Oxide Quantum Dots (GOQDs) flakes in different aqueous environments to determine the roles of these different interactions
As we reported in our previous study investigating the structures formed by GO flakes in polymeric m edia[29], molecular simulation is a powerful method by which to study these systems because we can control the composition and structure of GO, examine thermodynamically stable morphologies of GO and view dispersion and aggregation mechanisms with a high level of fidelity
Summary
Controlling the structure of graphene oxide (GO) phases and their smaller analogues, graphene (oxide) quantum dots (GOQDs), is vitally important for any of their widespread intended applications: highly ordered arrangements of nanoparticles for thin-film or membrane applications of GO, dispersed nanoparticles for composite materials and three-dimensional porous arrangements for hydrogels In aqueous environments, it is the chemical composition of the GO flakes that determines their morphologies; external factors such as pH and the coexisting cations influence the structures formed. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the GOQDs in self- assembled and fully exfoliated forms have been shown to be completely different[11,12,13], due to aggregation-mediated energy level reconstruction It has been observed in ultrahigh-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images that both GO and GOQDs contain domains of oxidation and graphitic regions, rather than a homogeneous distribution of oxidation sites across the GO surface[14]. GO can vary significantly depending on the method used to create it and the extent of oxidation, leading to a wide distribution of flake sizes and composition of functional groups, depending on the production m ethod[15]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.