Abstract

Large-scale systemic mouse phenotyping, as performed by mouse clinics for more than a decade, requires thousands of mice from a multitude of different mutant lines to be bred, individually tracked and subjected to phenotyping procedures according to a standardised schedule. All these efforts are typically organised in overlapping projects, running in parallel. In terms of logistics, data capture, data analysis, result visualisation and reporting, new challenges have emerged from such projects. These challenges could hardly be met with traditional methods such as pen & paper colony management, spreadsheet-based data management and manual data analysis. Hence, different Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) have been developed in mouse clinics to facilitate or even enable mouse and data management in the described order of magnitude. This review shows that general principles of LIMS can be empirically deduced from LIMS used by different mouse clinics, although these have evolved differently. Supported by LIMS descriptions and lessons learned from seven mouse clinics, this review also shows that the unique LIMS environment in a particular facility strongly influences strategic LIMS decisions and LIMS development. As a major conclusion, this review states that there is no universal LIMS for the mouse research domain that fits all requirements. Still, empirically deduced general LIMS principles can serve as a master decision support template, which is provided as a hands-on tool for mouse research facilities looking for a LIMS.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00335-015-9586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • This review shows that general principles of Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) can be empirically deduced from LIMS used by different mouse clinics, these have evolved differently

  • Supported by LIMS descriptions and lessons learned from seven mouse clinics, this review shows that the unique LIMS environment in a particular facility strongly influences strategic LIMS decisions and LIMS development

  • All seven mouse clinics are members of the IMPC consortium (Brown and Moore 2012; Koscielny et al 2014) and are committed to perform highthroughput mouse colony production and phenotyping according to common IMPC standards, which implies the overlap of LIMS requirements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS) may be defined as software tools with implemented features that support processes conducted in modern laboratories. Japan Mouse Clinic (JMC) has been set up in 2008 (Wakana et al 2009) by the expansion of the mouse phenotyping platform of the large-scale ENU Mutagenesis Program in RIKEN in which operations had been managed by a LIMS termed as Mutagenesis Universal Support DataBase (MUSDB) (Masuya et al 2004).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call