Abstract
The contrast mechanisms of domain imaging experiments assisted by atomic force microscope (AFM) have been investigated by model experiments on nonpiezoelectric (silicon oxide) and piezoelectric [Pb(Zr,Ti)O3] thin films. The first step was to identify the electrostatic charge effects between the tip, the cantilever, and the sample surface. The second step was to explore the tip–sample piezoelectric force interaction. The static deflection of the cantilever was measured as a function of dc bias voltage (Vdc) applied to the bottom electrode (n-type Si wafers) for noncontact and contact modes. In addition, a small ac voltage (Vac sin ωt) was applied to the tip to measure the amplitude (Aω) and phase (Φω) of the first harmonic (ω) signal as a function of Vdc. By changing from the noncontact to the contact mode, a repulsive contribution to the static deflection was found in addition to the attractive one and a 180° phase shift in Φω was observed. These results imply that in the contact mode the cantilever buckling is induced by the capacitive force between the cantilever and the sample surface. This interaction adds to the tip–sample piezoelectric interaction thereby overlapping the obtained tip vibration signal. Therefore, the antiparallel ferroelectric domain images obtained at zero dc bias voltage will show a variation in Aω but a negligible one in Φω. The capacitive force contribution to the tip vibration signal was further verified in piezoelectric hysteresis loop measurement assisted by the AFM. The observed vertical offset of the loops was explained by the contact potential difference between the cantilever and the bottom electrode. The shape of the curve could be explained by the capacitive force interaction combined with the tip–sample piezoelectric interaction. The experimental results obtained in this study support the interpretation of the cantilever–sample capacitive force contribution to the tip vibration signal in ferroelectric domain imaging experiments using AFM as a probing tool. The use of a large area top electrode between the tip and the sample resulted in the elimination of the electrostatic cantilever–sample interaction with negligible degradation of the domain contrast. This method proved to be successful because the cantilever–sample interaction was hardly detected and only the tip–sample interaction was observed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.