Abstract

Producing indices composed of multiple input variables has been embedded in some data processing and analytical methods. We aim to test the feasibility of creating data-driven indices by aggregating input variables according to principal component analysis (PCA) loadings. To validate the significance of both the theory-based and data-driven indices, we propose principles to review innovative indices. We generated weighted indices with the variables obtained in the first years of the two-year panels in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey initiated between 1996 and 2011. Variables were weighted according to PCA loadings and summed. The statistical significance and residual deviance of each index to predict mortality in the second years was extracted from the results of discrete-time survival analyses. There were 237,832 surviving the first years of panels, represented 4.5 billion civilians in the United States, of which 0.62% (95% CI = 0.58% to 0.66%) died in the second years of the panels. Of all 134,689 weighted indices, there were 40,803 significantly predicting mortality in the second years with or without the adjustment of age, sex and races. The significant indices in the both models could at most lead to 10,200 years of academic tenure for individual researchers publishing four indices per year or 618.2 years of publishing for journals with annual volume of 66 articles. In conclusion, if aggregating information based on PCA loadings, there can be a large number of significant innovative indices composing input variables of various predictive powers. To justify the large quantities of innovative indices, we propose a reporting and review framework for novel indices based on the objectives to create indices, variable weighting, related outcomes and database characteristics. The indices selected by this framework could lead to a new genre of publications focusing on meaningful aggregation of information.

Highlights

  • An index or composite measure can be used to represent an idea or an outcome

  • We generated weighted indices with the variables from the first years of the two-year Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) panels according to principal component analysis (PCA) loadings to predict mortality in the second years

  • Survival rates by months in the second years of the MEPS panels There were 244,089 individuals surveyed throughout the two-year panels in the first to 16th MEPS panels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An index or composite measure can be used to represent an idea or an outcome. The construction of weighted or unweighted indices involves several steps, including validation of individual measures that make up the indices, assessment of the variability between subjects, and index scoring[1, 5]. Besides external validity and generalizability, the statistical significance or predictive power between the produced index and external outcomes is important for wider use or subsequent application to other research topics[1]. A variety of frailty indices have been proven useful and statistically significant to predict major outcomes, such as mortality[9], surgical outcomes [10] and occurrence of disability[11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call