Abstract

Determining the reliability of a thermal power plant as a whole or in its individual components often requires long and very expensive tests under special operating modes on a very large number of samples or gathering the required exploitation data, which is even more difficult because of the choice of a general mathematical method (different forms of curves which quantitatively define reliability with different failure density functions and the high dependence of such curves on changes in the operating modes of components and environmental conditions). The introduction of approximate calculations, in order to overcome these problems, gives an insight into the basic reliability characteristics of the observed system as a whole, but also insufficiently exact final parameters, due to a whole series of larger or smaller approximations, as well as the inability to take into account all existing influences (development of new technologies, specifics newly developed disorders, etc.). Calculating the reliability of a complex system is only the first initial phase of verifying quantitative characteristics, that is, the hypothesis itself that we have more or less confidence in. Their final acceptance or rejection is a verification of reliability through the control of certain quantitative system indicators for the given technical conditions of operation. For these reasons, alternative terms are often used to verify reliability in the literature, such as reliability control or hypothesis testing. Designing a reliability model, through the application of simulation methods, to select the best parameters for the functioning of components and systems as a whole, in technological terms, should be supported by appropriate experimental methods (using collected data and stored data from the past). This paper provides an analysis of the application of the Markov process to assess the reliability of a complex thermal power system, with the aim of scheduling appropriate decisions on maintenance actions based on the required level of reliability. The optimum timing of replacement / repair of parts of a complex thermal power system is defined before its failure or the need to act correctively. Also, these models serve to provide a level of reliability by carrying out adequate maintenance actions on complex units within the thermal power plant.

Highlights

  • INTRODUCTIONComplexity, whether considering only the technological scheme or the installed equipment

  • Thermal power plants are characterized by their complexity, whether considering only the technological scheme or the installed equipment

  • By making certain assumptions, introducing technical diagnostics and maintenance according to the state and forming an appropriate database through organized collection of the failure data and their analysis using a wide range of statistical methods, the estimated values of the reliability indicators for a complex thermal power plant system can be obtained 10

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Complexity, whether considering only the technological scheme or the installed equipment. Markov's ( called Markof) process is named after Russian mathematician Andrei Markov, who introduced it in 1907 This process describes the future state of the system based on present parameters and makes the past and future state of the system to be independent. When it is not about continuous but discrete sizes we can talk about Markov chains. Markov processes are suitable for assessing the reliability of functionally complex systems and complex repair or maintenance strategies. They imitate the monotony of functions and processes. In the domain of continu-ous sizes i.e., Markov processes mathematical so-lutions of equations can be very inaccessible, which makes the applicability of the model as in many other cases seriously questionable

THERMAL POWER SYSTEM AS A COMPLEX TECHNICAL SYSTEM
PROBABILITY EQUATIONS OF SYSTEM STATE AND SOLVING THOSE EQUATIONS
Short-term forecast of reliability characteristics
Long-term forecast of reliability characteristics
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call