Abstract
Different theories of human reasoning produce alternative hypotheses about how personality and individual differences should relate to reasoning abilities. The present research documents a previously unclear significant relationship between theory of mind ability (measured via the mind in the eyes test) and conditional reasoning performance, which is differentially stronger for social rules rather than for descriptive, non-social contexts (Study 1, N = 316). A second study (N = 289) additionally documented associations between reasoning and both interpersonal trust (low reciprocation wariness) and Honesty-Humility. Secondarily, Study 2 also replicated a carryover effect for reasoning tasks, previously suggested as due to repetition priming. In Study 3 (N = 334), participants took a battery of trait measures that included the above significant predictors of social reasoning, additional measures of theory of mind ability, of interpersonal trust, and a measure of emotional intelligence. Reasoning again differed across contexts, documented priming/carryover effects between social/non-social reasoning tasks, and was significantly predicted by interpersonal trust and theory of mind. Differentially stronger correlations for social contents, relative to non-social contents, indicate some specificity in reasoning processes rather than entirely domain-specific reasoning.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
