Abstract

This paper presents a decision support model for the selection of the site (location) for crossing tanks under water as part of the overcoming of water obstacles by the Serbian army tank units. The model has two phases, defining the weight coefficients of the criteria using the method of ranking and selecting the most favorable alternative using the MAIRCA method (MultiAtributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis). The paper focuses on the application of the MAIRCA method, as a newer method that has emerged in the field of decision making. This method is based on finding the solution closest to the ideal one, through identifying the best value of the alternative according to the observed criterion and measuring the distance of other alternatives according to the observed criterion of the ideal value. Also, through the work are elaborated the criteria that this choice conditional and the presented application of the method in the concrete situation.

Highlights

  • Prijatelja iz vazduha, sa kopna ili sa vodene prepreke; K7 Uslovi maskiranja - mesto na kome se organizuje prelazak tenkova pod vodom treba da obezbedi dobru prikrivenost prilaska obali i vodenoj prepreci, kao i dobre uslove maskiranja na obali u situavijacije i sl.)

  • A2 odabrao i alternative iz skupa drugoragiranih alternativa (A4 i A1)

  • A multi-criteria decisionmaking (MCDM) model in the security forces operations based on rough sets, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, Vol 1, No

Read more

Summary

Opis metoda rangiranja i objedinjavanja

Gde je: r - rang, a j=1,2,...,n predstavlja kriterijume. Gde je: r rang, a n predstavlja ukupan broj kriterijuma. Gde je: m broj primenjenih metoda, a j=1,2,...,n predstavlja kriterijume. Gde m predstavlja ukupan broj alternativa koje se biraju. Ukoliko je zadovoljen uslov iz koraka 1 da je donosilac odluke neutralan u odnosu na po etni izbor alternative, pa je po etna verovatno a (PAi ) izbora pojedinih alternativa ista za sve alternative tada se formira matrica teorijskih pondera formata n x 1. U najve em broju slu ajeva donosilac odluke je neutralan u odnosu na po etni izbor alternative, pa je po etna verovatno a (PAi ) izbora pojedinih alternativa ista za sve alternative:.

DEFINISANJE KRITE INSKIH
RANGIRANJE ALTERNATIVA
ANALIZA KONZISTENTNOSTI IZLAZNIH REZULTATA
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call