Abstract

Abdominopelvic washing cytology is a common specimen evaluated for ovarian, fallopian tubal, and peritoneal cancer staging or other nongynecologic malignancies presented as metastases. We reviewed our experience in diagnosing abdominopelvic washing specimens and assessing the primary tumor types and origins of the positive abdominopelvic washings. A pathology archive database search was performed for abdominopelvic washing specimens from 2007 to 2018. The corresponding cytologic diagnoses, results of ancillary studies, clinical histories, and surgical follow-up were reviewed. The primary sites were determined based on the synoptic reports, when available. A total of 5.8% (350 of 6023) of cases were positive for malignancy or neoplasm. Additionally, 1.3% (78 of 6023) were diagnosed as atypical cells. Of the 350 positive cases, 93.4% were müllerian tumors. The frequency of primary sites for müllerian tumors in descending order were: ovary, uterus, fallopian tube, peritoneum, and uncertain müllerian sites. The common ovarian tumors identified in pelvic washing in descending order were: high-grade serous carcinoma, serous borderline tumor, clear cell carcinoma, low-grade serous carcinoma, and endometrioid carcinoma. Gastrointestinal, breast, bladder, and lymphoma primaries were the 23 nongynecologic tumors identified in pelvic washings. Positive findings in abdominopelvic washing cytology is rare. The majority of the positive cases were from müllerian origins, with ovary and uterus as the most common sites. Endometrial adenocarcinoma, endometrioid type and ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma were the most common tumor types. Knowing prior history of malignancy, morphologic comparison with concurrent surgical cases, and performing ancillary studies are keys to improve diagnostic accuracy of abdominopelvic washings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call