Abstract

This exploratory study examines the emotional responses toward non-player characters (NPCs) when challenged with an in-game moral decision (i.e. justified versus unjustified killing) and when exposed to game statistics on whether their moral choice aligned with the majority public. Using Buck et al.’s (2014) social and moral emotions (SAME) scale, participants (n = 301) completed an online experiment measuring their primary social emotions after being presented with a written scenario and screenshots from a popular video game that required participants to make a moral decision. Findings provide overall support for the interdependent connections in primary social emotions and revealed that embarrassment and shame were higher towards the NPC in the unjustified choice. Study results provide practical health implications for video game developers to develop and design more elaborate narrative paths that delve into the ethical tendencies of video game players.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.