Abstract

AimNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is promising to improve the survival of resectable gastric cancer. However, suitable regimen and treatment duration for NAC have not yet been established.MethodsWe conducted a randomized phase II trial to compare two and four courses of neoadjuvant S‐1/cisplatin (SC) and S‐1/cisplatin/docetaxel(DCS) using a two‐by‐two factorial design for locally resectable advanced gastric cancer. Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or scirrhous‐type cancer received two or four courses of SC or DCS. Then, patients underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S‐1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was 3‐year overall survival. The planned sample size was 120 eligible patients.ResultsBetween October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to CS (n = 66; 33 in 2‐courses and 33 in 4‐courses) and DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2‐courses and 33 in 4‐courses). The 3‐year OS was 58.1% in CS and 60.0% in DCS with hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.48‐1.34), while it was 53.1% in the two courses and 65.0% in the four courses with hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.43‐1.22). In the survival analysis by duration in each regimen, the 3‐year OS was 58.1% for both two and four courses in CS, while it was 48.5% for two courses of DCS and 71.9% for four courses of DCS.ConclusionsConsidering high 3‐year OS, four courses DCS has a value to be tested in a future phase III study to confirm superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.