Abstract

We compared the benefit of modification in surgical technique in relation to primary prophylaxis of heterotopic ossifications after total hip replacement with straight stem. This modification contains the so-called electromyotomy technique and was compared versus standard „cold blade“ technique. Two groups were assessed and matched by BMI, sex, age and arthrosis type undergoing hip replacement. Traumatic, dysplastic and rheumatic hips were excluded. A total of 682 patients were evaluated, 262 cemented, 402 uncemented and 18 hybrid types with minimum of 1 year follow-up (average 5.6 years). The standard “sharp blade” technique contained 313 hips, the alternative contained 369 hips. Surgeries were performed according to the same protocols and by one team via anterolateral approach. Patients with risk factors for heterotopical ossifications and administration of secondary prophylaxis modalities were excluded. The development of heterotopic ossification were assessed with blind control of radiologic specialists (Brooker´s grades). Heterotopic ossification (HO) developed in 32.69%, totally in 223 patients. Of those clinically relevant (Brooker III and IV grades) were 8.94%, in 61 patients. In standard group there were 137 HO in 313 hips (43.76%), clinically relevant in 12.78%, 40 patients. In this group there were 123 cemented hips with 53 HO, 174 uncemented with 74 HO and 16 hybrid prostheses with 10 HO. Average age was 68.53 years, 153 males, 160 females. In alternative electromyotomy group there were 369 hips with 86 HO (23.30%), clinically relevant HO cases developed in 5.69%, 21 patients. HO in particular types: 139 cemented hips with 43 HO, uncemented 228 with 42 HO and hybrid 2 with 1 HO. Average age was 70.56y, males 171, females 198. Statistic values of HO occurence between these groups favourising the electromyotomy group were significant, such as comparing the particular Brooker grades distribution and prosthesis type (cemented, uncemented). Significant decrease was observed mainly in uncemented joint replacements and in clinically relevant grades in electromyotomy group. A novel perspective on primary prophylaxis of heterotopic hip ossification after straight femoral stem total hip replacement with engagement of modification in surgical technique so called electromyotomy is presented. Statistical analysis of results in ossification development significantly favorising modified technique in all types of prosthesis fixation, notably in uncemented prosthesis types. The main drop in counts of clinicaly relevant grades of osifications is also statistically relevant. According to these findings this surgical step is routinely implemented in our technique of straight stem implantations nowadays.

Highlights

  • Heterotopic ossifications after implantation of total hip replacement are the well defined and stratified complication approved by the International Hip Society and are included in the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases under the code ICD-9 728.13

  • The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of primary prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement with straight stems by using modified surgical technique using electrotomy

  • Heterotopic ossification (HO) developed in 32.69%, totally in 223 patients, which is consistent with published data from other authors [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Heterotopic ossifications after implantation of total hip replacement are the well defined and stratified complication approved by the International Hip Society and are included in the 9th revision of the International Classification of Diseases under the code ICD-9 728.13. The 3rd and 4th degree according to Brooker scale are defined as a complication after total hip replacement. This complication stratification is classified into group 3 Its development is well known after particular injuries, burns, CNS damage (brain, spinal cord) or in some genetic diseases [5, 17, 22]. It is formed by cartilage with subsequent enchondral ossification. The exact cause and pathophysiological mechanisms why particulary these tissues are the site of ossification development is not definitelly explained nowadays

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.