Abstract

BackgroundThe evolutionary history of genes serves as a cornerstone of contemporary biology. Most conserved sequences in mammalian genomes don’t code for proteins, yielding a need to infer evolutionary history of sequences irrespective of what kind of functional element they may encode. Thus, sequence-, as opposed to gene-, centric modes of inferring paths of sequence evolution are increasingly relevant. Customarily, homologous sequences derived from the same direct ancestor, whose ancestral position in two genomes is usually conserved, are termed “primary” (or “positional”) orthologs. Methods based solely on similarity don’t reliably distinguish primary orthologs from other homologs; for this, genomic context is often essential. Context-dependent identification of orthologs traditionally relies on genomic context over length scales characteristic of conserved gene order or whole-genome sequence alignment, and can be computationally intensive.ResultsWe demonstrate that short-range sequence context—as short as a single “maximal” match— distinguishes primary orthologs from other homologs across whole genomes. On mammalian whole genomes not preprocessed by repeat-masker, potential orthologs are extracted by genome intersection as “non-nested maximal matches:” maximal matches that are not nested into other maximal matches. It emerges that on both nucleotide and gene scales, non-nested maximal matches recapitulate primary or positional orthologs with high precision and high recall, while the corresponding computation consumes less than one thirtieth of the computation time required by commonly applied whole-genome alignment methods. In regions of genomes that would be masked by repeat-masker, non-nested maximal matches recover orthologs that are inaccessible to Lastz net alignment, for which repeat-masking is a prerequisite. mmRBHs, reciprocal best hits of genes containing non-nested maximal matches, yield novel putative orthologs, e.g. around 1000 pairs of genes for human-chimpanzee.ConclusionsWe describe an intersection-based method that requires neither repeat-masking nor alignment to infer evolutionary history of sequences based on short-range genomic sequence context. Ortholog identification based on non-nested maximal matches is parameter-free, and less computationally intensive than many alignment-based methods. It is especially suitable for genome-wide identification of orthologs, and may be applicable to unassembled genomes. We are agnostic as to the reasons for its effectiveness, which may reflect local variation of mean mutation rate.

Highlights

  • The evolutionary history of genes serves as a cornerstone of contemporary biology

  • The paper is organized as follows: in Methods, we introduce a sequence-based property of nesting among maximal matches, demonstrate its relationship to primary/positional orthology, and propose a new contextbased method to identify such orthologs for a pair of genomes

  • Numerical simulations: performance of our method on the nucleotide level To evaluate the method proposed above, we implement a series of numerical simulations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most conserved sequences in mammalian genomes don’t code for proteins, yielding a need to infer evolutionary history of sequences irrespective of what kind of functional element they may encode. Orthologs and paralogs Sequences appearing in different genomes or within a single genome at frequencies beyond those expected on neutral evolution are expected to share common ancestors. Orthologs obtain special importance in phylogeny [3,4,5,6]: it is generally believed that orthologs from genomes of different species often if not always [7] share similar functions, while paralogs are more likely to develop new functions. Sequence duplication and other evolutionary events can complicate orthologous relationships. The notion of co-orthology reflects an inconsistency in the customary application of the term “orthologs” as a synonym for “equivalent genes.”

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call