Primary Hyperparathyroidism and Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring: Application of a Modified Interpretation in Patients With “Parathyroid Hormone Spikes”

Abstract

IntroductionIntraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) spikes occur in up to 30% of patients during surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism. This can lead to a prolonged PTH decline and cause difficulties in using current interpretation criteria of intraoperative PTH monitoring. The aim of this study aim was to evaluate an alternative interpretation model in patients with PTH spikes during exploration. Methods1035 consecutive patients underwent surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism in a single center. A subgroup of patients with intraoperative PTH spikes of >50 pg/mL were selected (n = 277; 27.0%). The prediction of cure applying the Miami and Vienna criteria was compared with a decay of ≥50% 10 min after excision of the enlarged parathyroid gland using the “visualization value” (VV; =PTH level immediately after visualization of the gland) as basal value. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. ResultsUsing the VV, sensitivity was 99.2% (Vienna 71.0%; Miami 97.7%), specificity was 18.2 (Vienna 63.6%; Miami 36.4%), and accuracy was 92.8 (Vienna 70.4%; Miami 92.8%). Of 255 single-gland disease patients, 72 were identified correctly as cured by applying the VV (P < 0.001), yet 10 of 22 patients with multiple-gland disease were missed compared with the Vienna Criterion (P = 0.002). The comparison with the Miami Criterion showed that six more patients were correctly identified as cured (P = 0.219), whereas four patients with multiple-gland disease were missed (P = 0.125). ConclusionsUsing the VV as a baseline in patients with intraoperative PTH spikes may prove to be an alternative and therefore can be recommended. However, if the VV is higher than the preexcision value, it should not be applied.