Abstract

Simple SummaryBecause FOLFIRINOX shows high prevalence of hematologic toxicity, it is meaningful to investigate of usefulness of primary G-CSF prophylaxis in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. In this retrospective study, a total of 165 patients were divided into G-CSF user group (n = 57) and non-user group (n = 105). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between two groups, which included initial absolute neutrophil counts and metastatic burden. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis reduced the risk of neutropenia (55.6% to 31.6%, p = 0.003) and febrile neutropenia (18.5% to 1.8%, p = 0.002) and improved OS (8.8 to 14.7 months; hazard ratio (HR): 1.766, 95% CI: 1.257–2.481, p = 0.001). When administering FOLFIRINOX for MPC, primary G-CSF prophylaxis could be rationalized to reduced AEs and improve survival, and more prospective studies are needed.Although FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) has been proven efficacious in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), physicians hesitate to administer it due to its hematologic toxicities. We investigated the usefulness of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis. We reviewed electronic medical records of MPC patients with good performance status who were administered FOLFIRINOX as the first-line treatment from 2011 to 2017. The patients were divided into primary G-CSF prophylaxis users (group A) and non-users or therapeutic/secondary users (group B). Cumulative relative dose (cRDI), adverse effects (AEs), and overall survival (OS) were compared. A total of 165 patients (group A (57) vs. group B (108)) were investigated. Intergroup differences in baseline characteristics were not significant, although the cRDI and the number of treatment cycles were both higher in group A than in group B (cRDI: 80.6% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.007; 9 vs. 6 cycles, p = 0.004). Primary G-CSF prophylaxis reduced the risk of neutropenia (55.6% to 31.6%, p = 0.003) and febrile neutropenia (18.5% to 1.8%, p = 0.002) and improved OS (8.8 to 14.7 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.766, 95% CI: 1.257–2.481, p = 0.001). When administering FOLFIRINOX for MPC, primary G-CSF prophylaxis could be rationalized to reduced AEs and improve survival; more prospective studies are needed.

Highlights

  • Pancreatic cancer (PC) was the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in both men and women in the United States in 2019 [1]

  • Since 2011, FOLFIRINOX is recommended as the first-line chemotherapy in metastatic PC (MPC) patients with good performance status [3,5]

  • In the present study, we investigated the usefulness of primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis in reducing hematologic adverse effects (AEs) and improving survival in MPC patients with good performance status who were treated with FOLFIRINOX

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PC) was the fourth leading cause of death from cancer in both men and women in the United States in 2019 [1]. Combination chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) have considerably contributed to improvements in the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic PC (MPC) since 2011, the overall five-year survival rate is 9%, still indicating an unfavorable prognosis [2,3,4]. Since 2011, FOLFIRINOX is recommended as the first-line chemotherapy in MPC patients with good performance status [3,5]. In 2019, modified FOLFIRINOX became a new a milestone in the adjuvant setting of resectable PC; the regimen is becoming more widely used [6]. FOLFIRINOX was demonstrated to show considerable hematologic and nonhematologic side effects, even with a dose-modified regimen. Modification of the FOLFIRINOX regimen while both maintaining efficacy and reducing toxicity remains an important issue [3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.