Primary care utilization and barriers among pediatric cancer and bone marrow transplant survivors.

Abstract

e22523 Background: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on childhood cancer survivorship specified the need to create and evaluate standards and alternative models of care delivery, including collaborative practices between oncologists and primary care physicians (PCP).1 We aimed to examine the utilization of primary care physicians by childhood cancer and bone marrow transplant (BMT) survivors, as well as identify barriers to non-oncology follow-up care. Methods: Survivors and caregivers were recruited from a cancer and bone marrow transplant survivorship clinic at a large Midwestern pediatric hospital. Participants completed a demographic survey and an 8-item semi-structured interview in clinic or online. Results: A total of 472 participants (211 survivors, 259 caregivers, 2 left unanswered) completed the survey (Survivors Mage= 26.11, SD= 7.32). Most participants were Caucasian (89%) and female (58%). Only 57 (12.3%) survivors received a BMT. There were no significant differences in PCP utilization between BMT survivors and those who did not receive a BMT, t(448) = -.519, p = .604. In addition, there were no significant group differences in PCP utilization between oncological and hematologic survivors, t(387) = 1.144, p = .253. Most survivors (87%) had a PCP, but 43% sought care for ill visits only. Survivors most commonly chose their PCP through referral from family or friends (45%), with only 4% obtaining a recommendation from their oncology provider. Top reasons for not having a PCP included being unsure who to see (52%), lack of insurance (20%), and not perceiving a need for a PCP (18%). In a logistic regression, greater annual family income ( β= .209, p< .001) and having health insurance ( β= .161, p< .01) were predictive of having a PCP. The frequency of PCP visits was also positively correlated with annual family income ( r= .13, p= .014). Conclusions: While most survivors had a PCP, higher income and insurance coverage were important predictors of having a PCP. There is a clear need for education and formal transition programs to primary care, as survivors and their family identified the need for guidance in choosing a PCP. Stronger partnerships between oncology and primary care providers may improve surveillance and outcomes for these survivors. 1. Blaauwbrock R, Zwart, N., Bouma, M., Meyboom-de Jung, B., Kamps, W., & A. Postma. The willingness of general practitioners to be involved in the follow up of adult survivors of childhood cancer. Journal of Cancer Survivors. 2007;1:292-297.