Abstract

Type C3 distal tibial plafond fractures consistently show poor outcomes with high complication rates and significant risk of posttraumatic arthritis. We describe a minimally invasive technique of performing a primary ankle fusion using an anterograde tibial nail and compare our early results to traditional methods of fixation. During the acute admission, the patient undergoes an arthroscopic preparation of the ankle joint and insertion of an anterograde nail into the talus. This technique is described in detail and presented alongside a retrospective 5-year review of all adult C3 distal tibial plafond fractures from our center. Twenty-six patients (8 open fractures) had been fixed traditionally using open reduction internal fixation (24 patients) and circular frames (2 patients) with an average follow-up of 20 months. Those internally fixed had protected weightbearing for 3 months. Complications included deep infection (12%), nonunion (8%), malunion (4%), severe posttraumatic osteoarthritis (27%), and the secondary conversion to ankle replacement/fusion (12%) requiring an average of 3 reoperations.Six patients underwent primary fusion (3 open fractures) with an average follow-up of 18 months. Patients were allowed to immediately weightbear. There were no reported complications and the primary fusion group demonstrated shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, and higher mean self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) compared to those treated with ORIF. C3 distal tibial plafond fractures are difficult to manage and there has not been a satisfactory method of treating them that allows early return to work, has a low risk of complications, and reduces the risk of posttraumatic tibiotalar arthritis.We present our initial results with a method that uses traditional arthroscopic techniques to prepare the tibiotalar joint together with minimally invasive anterograde tibiotalar nailing. In this initial report of a small group of patients, we found that surgery can be performed once the swelling has subsided after injury and that allowing weightbearing as tolerated did not appear to have a negative effect on initial outcomes. Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call