Abstract

We aim to bring together two current strands of research into inequalities in individuals' educational attainment that are associated with their social origins: that concerned with the "primary" and "secondary" effects of social origins in creating inequalities, and that concerned with the relation between these inequalities and different components of social origins, taken to represent different forms of parental resources. Our main findings are the following. The secondary effects of social origins-their effects via the educational choices that young people make given their prior academic performance-are clearly operative across five key educational transitions within the English educational system. More specifically, we estimate that 35% of the total effect of social origins is secondary in the earliest transition that we consider, and from 15% to 20% in the subsequent four. Furthermore, mediation analyses reveal that secondary effects are most strongly associated with parental education and then, to a lesser degree with parental status, while little association exists with parental class and none at all with parental income. Primary effects are also at all transitions most strongly associated with parental education and status but in this case both parental class and parental income do retain some importance. We suggest an explanation for our empirical findings as resulting largely from the concern of highly educated, professional parents, and their children to avoid the occurrence of downward intergenerational mobility, especially in terms of education and status.

Highlights

  • This paper brings together two current strands of research into inequalities in individuals’ educational attainment that are associated with their social origins: that concerned with the “primary” and “secondary” effects of social origins in creating inequalities, and that concerned with the relation between these inequalities and different components of social origins, taken to represent different forms of parental resources.The primary effects of social origins in regard to educational inequalities are those that lead to differences in young people's academic performance; the secondary effects are those that lead to differences in the educational choices that young people make, given performance

  • In seeking to bring these two strands of research together, we focus on secondary effects in educational inequalities and their importance relative to primary effects while at the same time examining how far primary and secondary effects differ in their association with parental class, status, and education

  • In the light of the foregoing, the two research questions on which we focus are the following: 1. In England, do secondary effects of social origins still operate, in addition to primary effects, in creating disparities in the transitions that young people do or do not make in their educational careers; and, insofar as they do operate, what is their importance relative to that of primary effects?

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

This paper brings together two current strands of research into inequalities in individuals’ educational attainment that are associated with their social origins: that concerned with the “primary” and “secondary” effects of social origins in creating inequalities, and that concerned with the relation between these inequalities and different components of social origins, taken to represent different forms of parental resources. Though not entirely consistent, cross-­national tendency exists (Jackson, 2013a) for secondary effects to weaken across successive educational transitions This would appear to result from selectivity based on previous performance usually becoming stronger at higher educational levels, with the scope for choice being reduced. 439), the data they have to use in determining social origins are “weak.” No information is available on parents’ class, status, education, or income—­only on a number of characteristics of the neighborhoods in which they live and on whether or not their children were eligible for free school meals This information is combined, through a principal components analysis, to produce a “socio-­economic status index,” and students are grouped into more or less advantaged background quintiles. TA B L E 1 Proportion (%) of respondents making five educational transitions by age 26

Continuing to postgraduate studies
GCSE performance
Accessing to elite university
ͲϬκ ϯϬ
Findings
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call