Abstract

The work deal on a method for optimisation of 330KV power system load flow which excels other existing methods.This method is called, PRIMAL-DUAL INTERIOR-POINT TECHNIQUE for solving optimal load flow problem. As problems of load-shedding, power outages and system losses have been cause for worries, especially among the developing nations such as Nigeria, hence need for a load flow solution technique, which, this work addresses. Optimisation is achieving maximum of required and minimum of un-required and it is obtained mathematically by differentiating the objective function with respect to the control variable(s) and equating the resulting expression(s) to zero. In 330KV Power System, optimization is maximisation of real power injection, voltage magnitude and cost effectiveness, while minimization of reactive power injection, power loss, critical clearing time of fault conditions and time of load flow simulation.. This work developed a mathematical model that solves load flow problems by engaging non-negative PRIMAL variables, “S” and “z” into the inequality constraint of the load flow problems in other to transform it to equality constraint(s). Another non-negative DUAL variables “” and “v” are incorporated together with Lagrangian multiplier “λ” to solve optimisation. While solving optimisation Barrier Parameter “” which ensures feasible point(s) exist(s) within the feasible region (INTERIOR POINT). Damping factor or step length parameter “α”, in conjunction with Safety factor “” (which improves convergence and keeps the non-negative variables strictly positive) are employed to achieve result. The key-words which are capitalized joined to give this work its name, the PRIMAL-DUAL INTERIOR-POINT. The initial feasible point(s) is/are tested for convergence and where it/they fail(s), iteration starts. Variables are updated by using the computed step size and the step length parameter “α”, which thereafter, undergo another convergence test. This technique usually converges after first iteration. Primarily, this technique excels the existing methods as; it solves load flow problems with equality and inequality constraints simultaneously, it often converges after first iteration as against six or more iterations of the existing methods, its solution provides higher power generations from available capacity and minimum system loss. Example, Geregu Power Station on Bus 12 generates 0.1786p.u power from the available 0.2000p.u through the PD-IP tech. as against 0.1200p.u of the existing methods. Also it supplies 0.1750p.u with loss of 0.0036p.u as against 0.0236p.u with loss of 0.0964p.u of the existing methods. This results in 90% generation as against 60% of existing methods. Generation loss is 1.8% as against 80.3% of existing methods and availability loss of 12.5% as against 88.2% of existing. Therefore this method ensures very high system stability.

Highlights

  • Since problems that occur in 330KV power system, if they are not handled with dispatch and swiftness result in total blackout with often catastrophic effects

  • To obtain solution for optimisation of Load Flow problems on 330KV power system that converges at first iteration. ii

  • Because of non-linearity of load flow equations, several mathematical solutions exist and this gives rise to nonuniqueness in the load flow calculations, with only one of the solutions with the minimum system losses and acceptable high voltages, as low voltage may correspond to unstable operation, is taken

Read more

Summary

Background to the Study

The load flow problems solution evolves from admittance(Y) matrix (Sato and Tinney, 1963) or impedance (Z) matrix, using Gauss-Seidel (Gauss and Raph,1980) and Newton-Raphson methods (Tinney and Hart,1967), to Decoupled Newton method (Stott, 1974), Fast Decoupled Load Flow (FDLF) (Stott and Alsac, 1974). The first known Interior-Point (I.P) method is attributed to Frisch (Frisch, 1955), which is a logarithmic barrier method (Wright, 1957) that was later in 1960s extensively studied by Fiacco and Mc Cormick (Fiacco and Mc Cormick, 1968) to solve nonlinear inequality constrained problems (Irisari et al, 1984 Torren and Quintina, 2001 Granville,2007). After 1984, several variants of Karmarka’s IP method have been proposed and implemented. Primal-Dual methods show that its algorithm proved to perform better than earlier IP algorithms

Problem Statement
The Aim
Justification for Study
Motivation for the Research
Optimisation Based On Economic Operation of Power System
Optimisation Based On Minimum Mismatch Method
Optimisation Based On Fast Decoupled Load Flow Method
Transforming Inequality Constraint to Equality Constraints
Optimality Conditions
Testing for Convergence
Primal-Dual Interior-Point Technique Numerical Algorithms
RESULT
Discussion of Results
Summary of Findings
Findings
Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call