Abstract

Primacy and recency effects in recall were used to assess an availability heuristic for judging category-frequency information. By “over-representing” the less frequently occurring category in the early and late positions of a list, relative-frequency information for these positions was biased. This manipulation significantly affected frequency estimates, but only when recall was not requested prior to the frequency-judgment task. Factors other than differential recall of category instances are likely involved in judgments of category frequency and the possible role of “automatic” frequency encoding is discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call