Abstract

Transitioning to the green economy relies on new developments that may change people's localities and involve certain risks. This study investigates how people form opinions about such developments, using mineral exploration and mining as an example. A representative sample (N = 1000) participated in a pre-registered online experiment. They were randomly assigned to (i) read information supporting or opposing mining, (ii) either state their position on the topic after reading this information or not, (iii) read counterarguments from the opposing perspective presented either alongside the original information or in isolation. We recorded a primacy effect: the first information that participants read biased subsequent opinion. This effect was reinforced when people were prompted to articulate their attitude before being exposed to the counterarguments and when they read counterarguments that integrated information about both risks and benefits of mining. These findings underscore the importance of the first information on the topic one encounters and suggest that opinions formed on the basis of this information can be difficult to change.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call