Abstract

Plant ontogeny is a common source of variation in defense and herbivory. Yet, few studies have investigated how the induction of physical defense traits changes across plant ontogeny. Physical defense traits are costly to produce, and thus, it was predicted that induction as a cost-saving strategy would be particularly favorable for seedlings, leading to ontogenetic declines in the inducibility of these traits. We tested for induction of three different physical defense traits (prickles, latex and leaf toughness) in response to mechanical defoliation and jasmonic acid application using prickly poppies (Argemone glauca and A. mexicana, Papaveraceae) as a model system. Genetic variation in the induction of physical defenses was tested using maternal sib-ships sampled from multiple populations. Both species induced higher densities of laminar prickles, although the magnitude of induction was much higher in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy, A. glauca, than in the cosmopolitan A. mexicana. The magnitude of prickle induction was also higher in young compared to older juvenile plant stages in A. glauca, demonstrating a strong role of ontogeny. Neither latex exudation nor leaf toughness was induced in either species. Although significant genetic variation was detected within and among populations for constitutive expression of physical defense traits in Argemone, there was no evidence for genetic variation in the induction of these traits. This study provides the first evidence for the induction of physical defenses in prickly poppies, emphasizing how an ontogenetically explicit framework can reveal new insights into plant defense. Moreover, this study illustrates how sister species comparisons between island vs. continental plants can provide new insights into plant functional and evolutionary ecology, highlighting a fruitful area for future research on more species pairs.

Highlights

  • Plant ontogeny has been shown to play a fundamental role in the expression of defense traits and patterns of herbivory [1,2,3]

  • Considerable attention has recently been paid to the characterization of ontogenetic trajectories of plant secondary chemicals [6] and tolerance to herbivory [7], but less is known about ontogenetic patterns in induced resistance

  • We revealed that plant ontogeny strongly influences the constitutive expression of all three defense traits, but only the inducibility of prickles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant ontogeny has been shown to play a fundamental role in the expression of defense traits and patterns of herbivory [1,2,3]. Ontogenetic patterns in plant defense traits occur in response to shifts in herbivore selection pressures over the lifetimes of plants [4], and as a result of developmental constraints and changes in resource allocation priorities [5]. Like constitutive defenses, induced defenses demonstrate ontogenetic variation. There is evidence for the opposite pattern, that the inducibility of secondary chemicals increases with plant age [11]. There is considerable evidence that physical defense traits, such as spinescence, leaf latex, and sclerophylly, are induced by herbivores [12,13,14,15,16], we have a poor understanding of how the induction of physical defenses may shift across plant ontogeny [17]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call