Abstract

We develop and empirically test a continuous-time equilibrium model for the pricing of oil futures. Our model provides a link between no-arbitrage and expectations-oriented models, and highlights the role of inventories in identifying different pricing regimes. We compare the hedging performance of our model with five other one- and two-factor pricing models. Our hedging problem relates to Metallgesellschaft's strategy to hedge long-term forward commitments with short-term futures. In the base case, the downside risk distribution of our inventory-based model stochastically dominates those of the other models. We test the stability of our results by varying the empirical design.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call